Author Archives: Nadir Garouche

No to nofollow

I stumbled upon a funny website today called no to rel”nofollow”. The site is in German, and  even if I did learn German at school, I’m unable to (or rather lazy trying to) understand what it says exactly but the site’s tagline is just what I need to understand the owner’s anger and to agree with him: “Fight Spam not Blogs”.

I’ve been enjoying Loren’s latest post 13 reasons why nofollow tags suck, and really agree with the whole idea against the use of nofollow. If comments are edited, I don’t see why anyone would not give any link love to his readers and commenters who, in a certain way, help websites get more content, more links, and more traffic. Moreover, plugins such as Akismet, which work extremely well, should be sufficient to prevent spammy comments.

For that reason, I will soon remove link condoms on this blog, but beware, people whose names are “seo software”, “free directory” or “cool company” will still not get a link. Just real names please 🙂

The State of Mobile Search

As promised in my previous post, and after spending a month discovering Mobile Search Engines and Mobile SEO, I will try to give you an insight on mobile search.

You’ve probably came across a lot of blog posts lately, or news articles, saying that Mobile Search was hot. In fact, people have been saying that mobile search was hot for years, but I really think it was just hype.

But I don’t think it’s the case as of today. Mobile network operators are starting to realize that Search is important for their clients, be it to search for mobile content, to get driving directions, to search a chinese restaurant nearby, or to get answers.

It’s not just about providing a search engine to their users, network operators need to provide a search engine that truly creates a good user experience.

Traditional search engines are also seeing an immense opportunity to get more users and to drive more advertising revenues, Eric Schmidt recently said that it’s in 2007 that we will start seeing big moves from Google in the mobile search space:

It is clear that 2007 will be the year that mobile search query traffic grows substantially. Our current model is to use targeted text ads and we have evidence that the monetization of those ads is higher than in non-mobile uses. So it looks like the advertising revenue on a per-search query is likely to be significantly higher on mobile than on non-mobile.

So, who are mobile search engines? How do people use search engines on their mobiles and what do they search for? Do traditional search engines such as Yahoo, Google or MSN have a chance to reproduce their desktop success on mobile phones?

  1. Mobile Search Engines

In the mobile search world, there are two kinds of search engines. You have what we call on-portal (or on-deck) search engines. These are search engines that network operators use on their WAP portal to help users find and discover content available on the operator’s portal.

And then you have off-portal mobile search engines, that is, traditional search engines that crawl the web and index web and WAP (or mobile friendly) pages.

  • On-Portal Search Engines

On-Portal Search Engines are used by mobile operators to index all the content available on their portals. Operators’s portal haven’t had a search box since the beginning, but they started to implement that function when they realized how hard it was for people to locate content when there were so many links and categories.

On-Portal search engines are either developed in-house by the mobile operators, or they are using a white label solution.

The most popular white label on-portal search engines are:

MotionBridge: a french company that Microsoft acquired in March 2006. Many are saying that they are the leaders in the on-deck search industry, but I couldn’t get any figures to prove that.

Fast: The leader in enterprise search provides a mobile search engine called mSearch. I know that they are powering Vodafone’s portals, but don’t know who are their other clients.
JumpTap: This company was created in 2004, but it has been growing fast. They recently closed a deal with T-Mobile USA, and also have Alltel as one of their clients.

MedioSystems: Bryan Lent, a Stanford’s graduate is the CEO. Their search engine offers a unique recommendation feature to help users discover new content and information when they are performing a search.

Basically, on-deck search engines allow network operators to index their partner’s content properly to provide the right results to their users, but some of them also provide off-deck results (JumpTap will show on-deck content first, and also off-deck content indexed with their crawler).

  • Off-Portal Search Engines:

Basically, off-portal search engines are engines that are independent from networks. When you use Google or Yahoo! in your mobile directly from your browser, it will deliver results from their Web and/or Mobile Web index.

And that’s why mobile network operators are afraid of these guys, they do want their users to buy mobile content elsewhere, while they could buy it directly from their portals… So, they’re trying to do whatever they can to get their slice of the mobile search market. See this article released today about Europe’s biggest telecom companies willing to build a mobile search engine that could rivals with traditional search engines.
Obviously, the most popular off-portal engine is Google. Then come Yahoo!, MSN, Ask and AOL.

These guys are using different ways to promote their mobile search engines. They either sign agreements with mobile constructors to embed a search application direclty into phones, for example Google with Samsung or Yahoo and Motorola or Nokia (with Yahoo! Go).
Or they are signing deals directly with network operators, for example Google signed an important deal with China Mobile, the leading network in China.

MSN is playing the catch-up but is clearly willing to get things done right in the mobile search space with Live!.

So who’s leading the mobile search space? Traditional Search Engines (Google, Yahoo, MSN) or On-Portal Engines (Branded, White Label, etc)? It’s really hard to tell, it’s almost impossible to find the number of users of each mobile search engine.

Personnaly, I would say that on-portal search engines are the leaders right now, but the Big 3 will get more market shares in the following months and years. To me, it makes no doubt that Google will be the leader, not because they are the leader of desktop search, but because they have lots of cash. They could either offer a huge amount of money to every leading network operators to get their search engine on their portals, or even provide their own mobile network, or a Google Phone…
2. Mobile Search Behavior:

The most popular paper released about mobile search behavior comes from Google. From that study, we can see that the most popular keywords are related to Adult, Entertainment, Internet and Telecom, Local Services, Games etc.

Due to limited screen real estate, search queries are obviously smaller. As for search results pages, people will mainly click on the first and second result. Below that position, you’ll be invisible on a mobile… Because of screen real estate, sites that have short title tags, links, and phrases will get high CTR.
People also spend less time on a website due to high browsing costs, so you need to deliver your message quickly and make it easy for your visitors to buy your products or submit their contact information.

I will provide a few tips in the next few days for those interested in mobile search engine optimization, I thing I’ve written enough for now 🙂

How To Get Links That Are Undetectable

….and how to make sure the links you buy pass value (yes, I mean PageRank).

Beware guys, Matt Cutts has warned people that links sold by V7N network are against their guidelines. Yeah, we know it Matt. But I’m sorry, as long as Google will give that much power to links, I don’t think the big companies out there will give up chasing PageRank. They are realizing that SEO is bringing them the best ROI they ever experienced, and they prefer to take the risk rather that spending millions in traditional marketing, or in AdWords…

So yes, it’s true that Google is good at idenfying paid links and it doesn’t take them long to stop the link juice that the selling page/site used to pass.

Now, it’s not that I’m encouraging people to buy links, but if you have no other choice, or if you’re too lazy, here are a few tips to get links that are undectable and to make sure they’re passing value (PR):

1. Make Private Deals:

Get links directly from the site owner. The best it to get links from niche sites, you often find popular sites that don’t already sell links and that have a nice PageRank, these are golden partners.

2. Buy Presell Pages:

Sitewide links suck. Always try to ask your link partner to host a page dedicated to you. Provide him with a page that you’ve written in which you’ll plug links. Then, tell the site’s owner to link this page “only” from the homepage. Within a few months this page will get a nice PageRank and all the pages you’ve linked to will benefit from that.

3. Prefer links inside paragraphs:

Avoid orphan links. Links inside a paragraph look more natural than sitewide links.

4. Use a test page before buying your link:

Many people are buying links without knowing if they are for sure helping them. How one can be sure that a link is passing value? I will share a little trick with you.

Before spending hundreds of dollars per month to get a link from a site, ask the site owner to link to a random page you’d have created to test its link juice. Let’s say you have a website www.domain.com, create a random page, ie xhssjls.html, in which you put in some random content. DO NOT link to this page from your website. This page should be virgin of any link!!! Ask your potential link partner (and only him!) to link to that page (www.domain.com/xhssjls.html). Then wait a few days and see if Google indexes the page. If it’s indexed, that’s already a good sign.

Then wait another couple of weeks and use a PageRank checker tool or the Google Toolbar to see if the page (www.domain.com/xhssjls.html) has gained PR. If that’s the case, it probably means your partner’s site is passing PageRank and is not “penalized” by Google…

Switching Back To Bloglines

Ok, I’m definitely fed up with Google Reader. Because everyone was talking about it and saying it was sooooo cool, I decided to give it a try and added a few of my favourite Bloglines feeds. But I just realized that I hate Google Reader’s user interface.

Plus, their shiny colors are killing my eyes, since I spend almost 2 hours per day reading feeds, I just can’t bear it.

Bloglines is much more simpler to use and has a nice user interface. Now I understand why it’s still the most popular feed reader.

Bloglines also has a big advantage over Google Reader: Bloglines has a real customer service! Really, I’ve contacted them twice: once to know how to display posts that are marked as read, and then because a splog added itself in my feeds list (really)!
Here’s the nice response I got from them:

Discussion Thread
 Response (M.M.) 12/06/2006 06:47 PM
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Could you let us know if the erroneous feed replaced any of your subscriptions? We will forward your information to the appropriate technical department for further investigation, as we take these matters seriously, and want to prevent this type of activity. We regret any inconvenience this may have caused. Also, should you receive any other unwelcome blogs, please let us know.
 Customer 12/03/2006 06:56 PM
Hi,
I just checked out my feeds and realized that a feed was added to my list “by itself”. The url of that feed is http://blog-editor.blogspot.com/index.html , I tried to see what kind of website and it’s apparently just a site full of ads… Could you please explain me how that kind of thing can happen? If you don’t how to prevent that problem, please do let me know and I will choose a safer feed reader.
Regards,
Nadir

Good bye Google Reader, it’s good to see you again Bloglines!

Stepping Into Mobile Search

I recently left the firm for which I was doing SEO consulting. As some of you know, I’ve been working for Aposition since April 2006 in order to build and manage SEO campaigns for medium and large websites.

I was proud to work with such a good company, full of talented folks. Aposition is a well reknowed SEO company here in France and Europe. This recognition is mostly due to their very first sucess with Kelkoo (a Yahoo Company), a shopping comparison engine which owns most of its early sucess to the great SEO efforts brought by Aposition.
I’ve been learning a lot during my time at Aposition, both in terms of SEO, but also in terms of management and client relationship. This position was also a chance for me to get to know more about the Internet marketing industry in France and in Europe.

I’m leaving on good terms, and I’ll still be in touch with people from Aposition, and will still meet them on Fridays to have a drink and play pool or video games 🙂

So what’s next? Well, I’ve just started as an inhouse SEO Manager for a large mobile content provider. This won’t be a regular SEO job. In fact, I will take care mainly of mobile search projects. I have no previous experience in mobile search optimization as such, since it’s really new, but I’m progessively learning.

In the next few days, I will try to give you an insight of mobile search and share a few tips.

What I can tell you so far is that traditional search engines are doing all they can to get their part of the growing mobile search pie. But it ain’t that easy. In fact, they’re kind of struggling. Most of searches made on mobile today are “on-deck”, which means that most of mobile users are searching from their operators’s WAP portal.

And most of the operators are afraid of Google and others. They prefer to use white label technologies from new firms, such as JumpTap for Virgin Mobile USA, or Medio Systems for T Mobile USA.

However, Google and others have managed to sign deals with network operators, for example Google recently signed a deal with China Mobile, the largest operator in China.

I have added a new category to this blog: Mobile Search, hopefully I will fill it with useful posts for those interested in mobile search optimization.

No Title Tag On Your Page? Don’t Worry, Google Will Use Your Headers Instead

One of my colleagues today noticed something weird with a client’s website. Basically, because of a problem with their CMS, some of this french site’s pages do not have title tags. While my colleague was working on the website, she realized that in its index, Google displayed some text in the SERPS for what’s usually the title tag..

Let’s take this page as an example. As you can see, there’s no title tag. Now let’s look at the cached version of this page in Google :

The text displayed instead of the title tag is actually a header. Google is showing the first header that it found on the page. In our example, the first header in the source code is a h2 (note: there’s no h1 tag on the page) :

<div id=“lang”>
div>

<div id=“last_news”>

<h2>Dernière minute

I’ve checked other titleless pages from this site, and in the SERPS, Google always shows this h2 tag instead of the missing title tag. The first header tag is always this h2 tag containing the text “Dernière Minute”, or “Fresh News” in english. Unfortunately, the site didn’t make a clever use of Hx tags to structure their document, if they did, Google would have showed something relevant to users, but that’s not the case…

This is yet another example that respecting basic accessibility principles will be appreciated by Google and improve both your rankings and the user experience.
I tried to see if someone else came across the same case, and found this guy.